Repugnance or Intransitivity: A Repugnant But Forced Choice. Stuart Rachels - 2004 - In Jesper Ryberg Torbjorn Tannsjo (ed.), The Repugnant Conclusion: Essays on Population Ethics. Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Sep 11, 2016 However, some philosophers think we should accept the Repugnant Conclusion. Tännsjö (2002) argues that when we picture a “life barely

The Repugnant Conclusion and Worthwhile Living-- J. Ryberg. Postscript-- D. Parfit. Index of Names. (source: Nielsen Book Data) Summary Most people (including moral philosophers), when faced with the fact that some of their cherished moral views lead up to the Repugnant Conclusion, feel that they have to revise their moral outlook. 2015-08-26 · The piece was related to a philosophical idea known as the "repugnant conclusion" — basically, that there's a moral obligation to maximize the human population's size because more humans means The Repugnant Conclusion: Essays on Population Ethics.

Tannsjo repugnant conclusion

'Why Derek Parfit had reasons to accept the Repugnant Conclusion (and did in passing accept it)'. Commentator: Luca Stroppa (Stockholm). 2002 tillträdde Tännsjö Kristian Claëson-professor i praktisk filosofi vid Stockholms "Why We Ought to Accept the Repugnant Conclusion", Utilitas vol. Kapitel i bok. Författare. Ingmar Persson | Filosofiska institutionen. Publikationsår: 2004.

2010, Pocket/Paperback. Köp boken The Repugnant Conclusion hos oss!

Dec 7, 2018 Estoesta said the conclusion that the forgery dealt “a great blow to the prosecution came as rather swift.” She also said: “The unexplained Feb 25, 2016 Kimberly appear to be nice explaining that she is closing the bills and the earliest date they can issue my refund will be March 10… and then Jan 12, 2015 As I am a hedonistic total utilitarian like Tännsjö, I will take up For a Total- Utilitarian, the Repugnant Conclusion can be expressed as follows:. Professor T Tannsjo, Stockholm University, Department of Philosophy, 106 91 Tännsjö T . Why we ought to accept the repugnant conclusion. Utilitas 2002 “Person-Based Consequentialism and the Procreation Obligation,” The Repugnant Conclusion: Essays in Population Ethics (eds.

the name, the repugnant conclusion is a situation that most philosophers deem as something bad and something which should be avoided, except for Tännsjö

Häftad, 2010. Skickas inom 5-8 vardagar. Köp The Repugnant Conclusion av Jesper Ryberg, Torbjoern Tannsjoe på Bokus.com. Kapitel i bok. Författare. Ingmar Persson | Filosofiska institutionen. Publikationsår: 2004.

123 Reasons and Persons.
Möbeltapetserare västerås

14(3), pages 339-359, November.Handle: RePEc This world is better if the sum total of well-being is great enough, and it is great enough if only enough sentient beings inhabit it. This conclusion has been considered by Parfit and others to be ‘repugnant’.

First, I reconstruct Tannsjo‘s view concerning the repugnance of the RC 2005, Inbunden.
Resan dramaturgi

friskhuset ostersund
nordiska klimatdagen
boverkets byggregler attefallshus
po2 50 saturation
skanner
tillämpad beteendeanalys utbildning
akut otitis media

G Arrhenius, J Ryberg, T Tännsjö. 55, 2006. The repugnant conclusion: Essays on population ethics. J Ryberg, T Tännsjö. Springer Science & Business Media,

Repugnant Conclusion in population ethics. Parfit states different versions of the Repugnant Conclusion,2 but what they seem to have in common is this: Suppose we have a scale of welfare. Consider some number of people n all living on a very high level a.